Alex Meshkin

Two brands and two industries synonymous with NASCAR – Coors Light (Coors Brewing) and Texaco Havoline (Chevron) have in subsequent years cut ties with Chip Ganassi Racing and ultimately vacated NASCAR team sponsorship. The association and sponsorship of these two industries – Beer and Gasoline/Oil companies with NASCAR have by far the greatest value proposition; and yet they are leaving NASCAR? What is going on here? Even for someone like me who has been writing about the difficult NASCAR sponsorship market is surprised and concerned with Texaco pulling the plug on its storied NASCAR sponsorship program.

What is the root cause of these two prominent and long-term sponsors leaving NASCAR? The answer is simple: there are too many compelling alternatives which have a greater ROI and offer far less risk. Let’s be honest, primary sponsors are asked to commit up to $25 Million to purchase “so called advertising” without any meaningful guaranties of consumer advertising impressions. Sounds rather ominous, right?

Of course, sponsoring Dale Earnhardt Jr. and any of the other top performing drivers offers a unique value proposition: residue value through their brand loyal fans, merchandise and alike. But the vast majority of sponsors are receiving a diminishing ROI by virtue of the rising costs of NASCAR sponsorship and decreased television viewership and race attendance. Since 2004, the cost of becoming a primary sponsor of a top performing Sprint Cup team has soared by over 60% while television ratings have dropped by about 10%. The dichotomy of rising sponsorship costs and decreased television exposure is a disturbing trend which is primarily affecting the worst performing teams but could soon start to challenge the most elite NASCAR teams. The change in corporate sponsors’ attitudes towards NASCAR sponsorship shouldn’t surprise anyone.

However, NASCAR and its Teams have either refused or do not understand how to evolve in the digital age where advertisers can purchase measureable and interactive advertising with far less risk and much greater ROI. Unlike, most “traditional” businesses that reinvent themselves and innovate; NASCAR has failed to bring forth any meaningful innovations that can directly increase sponsors’ exposure and ROI.

Chip Ganassi Racing has had and continues to be one of the best performing open-wheel racing teams; and clearly delivers on and off the track performance for Target in the IndyCar Series. But unfortunately, Chip Ganassi’s foray into NASCAR has been a bitter disappointment. In 2006, Chip Ganassi secured Juan Pablo Montoya to pilot the #42 Texaco Dodge in the Sprint Cup series and hoped the media attention of the former IndyCar and Indy 500 Champion would ignite the performance and success of his NASCAR team. But excluding a few promising races (mostly on road courses) Montoya’s NASCAR career has underperformed. It appears Chip Ganassi Racing may be another victim of the sponsorship race; and soon join NASCAR’s elite defunct team list.

Unlike, the NASCAR Silly Season of 2008, Formula 1 hasn’t seen any real drama or excitement with driver swaps and changes as the paddock prepares for the 2009 season. But is that about to change?

As many F1 enthusiasts know, Fernando Alonso is calculating and plotting his next career move in order to place him back with a championship caliber racing team. Most motorsports’ analysts have assumed Alonso would stay at Renault for another year and then head to Scuderia Ferrari in 2010. But this may not happen – at least that is the opinion of Hans-Joachim Stuck; a famous Grand Prix driver in the 70’s who now heads up Volkswagen’s racing division. Stuck, who prior to his VW appointment was long associated with BMW, believes the German brand should strive for a long-term contract with Alonso to partner Robert Kubica.

As an avid Formula 1 follower, an Alonso-BMW deal may be the final element BMW requires to compete with the upper echelon Formula 1 organizations such as McLaren Mercedes and Scuderia Ferrari. But one must wonder will Alonso join another team which hasn’t yet proven their ability to challenge for a drivers’ championship. But then again, from BMW’s vantage point you certainly can’t argue with Hans-Joachim Stuck: “If you can secure an Alonso for the long term, then you must,” Stuck insisted. If BMW wants to increase their chances of convincing Alonso to commit – in the coming grand prix they better recapture the on-track performance they displayed earlier this season.

On a personal note, as a long-term fan of Fernando Alonso and a dedicated BMW driver; the combination of the two would bring a whole new excitement to the Formula 1 grid in 2009.

Looks like Joey Logano will be the ultimate beneficiary of Tony Stewart leaving Joe Gibbs Racing (JGR). All signs are indicating that Joey Logano will receive the nod from Joe Gibbs to replace Tony Stewart in the #20 Home Depot Toyota Camry for the 2009 season.

The Joe Gibbs Racing plans call for the 18-year old to make his NASCAR Sprint Cup debut at Richmond International Raceway on September 6th, with additional races to be announced within the next 2-3 weeks.

Logano has had an impressive racing career over the past several years as he moved from ASA to the NASCAR ladder system. But one most wonder if he is moving to Sprint Cup too soon? Unlike most of the young talents in their inaugural season in Sprint Cup, in 2009 a direct comparison will likely be made between Logano and Kyle Busch. Kyle is the top performing driver of 2008 and will now be Logano’s teammate, both having identical equipment. With that said, this could make an interesting brew and could be a difficult test for young Logano as he attempts to demonstrate his talents. If he disappoints – it could have devastating implications to the youngster and may ultimately detract from his progression; consequently harming his long term prospects.

Has anyone noticed the decreased television advertising from Anheuser-Bush, Miller and Coors during NASCAR Sprint Cup race telecasts? Following the split of Dale Earnhardt Jr., Budweiser and Dale Earnhardt Inc.; Anheuser-Bush has apparently rapidly diminished their dominate presence over our weekly telecasts. In my opinion, this is the procuring cause to Miller and Coors’ also reducing their media placements during NASCAR broadcasts. While I don’t have the numbers to backup my observations, nonetheless, I think the anecdotal evidence is enough to question the “Dale Jr” effect on the return-on-investment (ROI) of the NASCAR television contract for Fox, NBC, TNT and ABC/ESPN.

So I question, is their enough of a demand to offset the loss of beer ads? If so, I certainly would be surprised if that demand will withstand the current economic pressure. But for sure, no one expected the self-interested actions of Teresa Earnhardt to have such a negative impact and affect so many other parts of the NASCAR food chain. It seems apparent that you can add the broadcasters to the list of people and companies that are keeping their distance from Teresa Earnhardt.

Earlier this week, ESPN expanded its motorsports digital content business through the acquisition of Racing-Live.com. Racing-Live.com covers Formula 1 (F1-Live.com), Moto GP; Superbike (Moto-Live.com), Rally (Rally-Live.com), off road Rallies (Raid-Live.com), Endurance Sports-Cars and Kart racing.

This announcement follows the acquisition of Jayski, a NASCAR gossip site in 2007. Racing-Live.com strengthens ESPN’s global business and provides a digital avenue to monetize Formula 1 racing through the site’s three million unique users per month.

I’m delighted that ESPN now offers sports fans world-class online coverage of football, rugby, cricket and motor racing, said Lynne Frank, Managing Director of ESPN, Europe, Middle East and Africa. Racing-Live.com is a leader in its category and has built a solid base from which to further develop our digital motor sports offering. We are particularly pleased that Racing-Live.com joins ESPN in the middle of another fantastic Formula 1 season.

It is going to be interesting to observe how ESPN integrates Racing-Live into its portfolio of digital media businesses; given Racing-Live isn’t the first digital media acquisition made by ESPN. Since the acquisition of Jayski in 2007, very little has changed and even its website has remained almost identical since its inception in 1996. The business model of Jayski is very different than traditional media sites and focuses primarily on unofficial team generated content – basically translated; employees’ of race teams share gossip, rumors, opinions and often lies about their employers and/or competitors. This model has created a very sticky site and thus was a procuring reason for ESPN acquiring Jayski.

Some may wonder if the Jayski model would be successful in Formula 1. I seriously doubt it and this is why: NASCAR is a unique culture with the rumor mill driven primarily by the close physical proximity of all the race teams. Speaking from personal experience; if I had lunch with a driver from another team – it would instantly be posted to Jayski …”hearing XYZ driver may be headed to Bang Racing.” While there is an element of truth to the “gossip”- it is usually twisted with an element of fiction.

Because the culture of NASCAR Sprint Cup is clearly trending more towards Formula 1 than vice-a-versa; and with the super teams becoming more self-sufficient and less reliant on vendors to support the sponsorship development process; it is likely that Jayski’s sources will be minimized at best and rumors and the like will become less prevalent.

With that said; don’t expect to see ESPN exporting the Jayski business model over the pond; but maybe expect to see Racing-Live expanding into mainstream American motorsports.