Many, at first glance, didn’t feel that the Chrysler bankruptcy filing on Thursday would have any effect on the Sprint Cup teams backed by Dodge. And Chrysler was quick to issue a statement on Thursday reaffirming their commitment to NASCAR. It really should not come as a surprise that the new management from Fiat realizes the current iteration of the COT and the marketing platform offered by NASCAR is too expensive and doesn’t align with their new focus. Fiat/Chrysler’s new focus is on small fuel efficient cars and not on outdated large cars that inspired the NASCAR “Car of Tomorrow”.

Many sources strongly believed that Chrysler (Dodge) may pull its NASCAR funding in 2010. As many know, Dodge already slashed its motorsports budget by 30 percent this year. Then the question becomes this: What would happen to the teams that Dodge financially supports, if indeed they pull their support? That is the great unknown.

As I have professed for over two years, NASCAR is facing a crossroad; but yet, it continues down an ill-fated pathway of an outdated “Car of Tomorrow” instead of adopting a fresh approach that would leverage “green technologies” such as, biofuels and renewable energy, and a branding platform that is attractive to companies like Fiat. As I stated in July 2008,

You must wonder – why is NASCAR asleep at the wheel? Over the past decade, NASCAR has developed a phenomenal market platform for all types of companies – but without the financial and marketing support of the carmakers – NASCAR teams can’t afford to operate.
The time is now for NASCAR to embrace tomorrow’s future – alternative energy and fuel efficiency branding is required for the long-term viability of the sport as a marketing platform for the automotive manufacturers. (See: http://tinyurl.com/cwcjpj)

I am a strong believer that negative events create opportunities. NASCAR and the Big 3 (GM, Ford and Chrysler) at one time were going down a parallel road, but unfortunately as NASCAR started to become a rapidly growing mainstream sport in the early part of the decade and corporate sponsors rushed into the sport with their large marketing budgets looking to tap into this brand-loyal demographic, NASCAR lost sight of the value proposition and ROI required to keep the Big 3 involved in NASCAR. In the next couple of years, many will ask, why didn’t NASCAR do more to keep the Big 3 involved? The answer is quite simple, NASCAR and their Teams have a huge disconnect, and what’s good for NASCAR isn’t always what’s best for their Teams. Unlike all other major sports, like the NHL, NBA, MLB, and NFL; NASCAR team owners don’t have any say in the direction and decisions of the sport, nor do they participate in the financial upside during the good times. But what I do know is that they do bare the majority of the consequences during the difficult times. When Chrysler/Dodge leaves NASCAR, many teams will suffer and likely shutdown, but NASCAR Corporate will face very little short-term repercussions.

With the economic recession, dreadful environment for automakers and falling ratings of NASCAR racing, NASCAR has the opportunity to implement needed changes to put the sport in a position for growth and long term sustainability.

The solutions and answers for NASCAR are quite simple: race a car that is aligned with the automakers objectives, provide a fair distribution of revenues to competitors (teams), implement rigid cost controls; and, equally as important, please allow the drivers the freedom to race without the fear of penalties for relatively harmless actions. NASCAR, after all is said is done, should be entertainment.

NASCAR today must be more than just a marketing platform. It needs to become a technical platform and support R&D objectives for the automakers. Evaluating NASCAR in the most cynical viewpoint, one could argue that the archaic technology, i.e. the use of carburetors, instead of fuel injection, is continuing the public persona that the Big 3’s product portfolio is less than innovative. It’s time for NASCAR’s leadership to make the necessary changes in the best interests of their lifeblood – their teams and automakers.

I want to enforce my statements in my post on July 21st:

NASCAR has a real opportunity for leadership – and can provide automotive manufacturers a real marketing platform that demonstrates alternative energy as performance cars – that are viable, affordable and energy efficient – and return NASCAR to its roots as “stock car” racing at its best.

NASCAR is standing at the crossroads, where the wrong decision could be the final nail in the coffin. Their choice may be a future of IROC style racing or one of a balance of innovative technology with the proper cost controls in place to secure the long term stability of all stakeholders. Unfortunately, if NASCAR becomes the next IROC, I am afraid their future will most likely be rather bleak.

Could this be a sign that Roush Fenway Racing is unable to secure a replacement sponsor for the American Automotive Association (AAA); and perhaps plans to accelerate its mandatory downsizing one year earlier?

On the other hand, it’s no secret that both Jamie McMurray and Jack Roush are extremely disappointed by their performances and both would welcome a change. However, with the enhanced marketing competition from Stewart Haas Racing, it’s unlikely that Roush Fenway will find a suitable replacement for the AAA and will be forced to move David Regan into the Crown Royal/Irwin Tools Ford.

As NASCAR Silly Season comes to a peak at the end of August, expect more announcements on the future plans of Ryan Newman, Martin Truex Jr., Casey Mears and Jamie McMurray.

The founding principle and most basic concept behind NASCAR was and is “stock car” racing; and the ability for carmakers to demonstrate their performance of a car that closely models a car in the local showroom. This principle is no longer applied in NASCAR and is one of the basic problems existing for carmakers today in justifying their marketing expenditures in NASCAR.

“Stock car” doesn’t mean “old” or antiquated but means the use of current technologies which are closely tied to their street car equivalents. The age old adage of “Win on Sunday and Buy on Monday” is no longer applicable in NASCAR – and is contributing to the eroding sales of the Big 3. Furthermore, the COT is alienating carmakers by further dividing marketing objectives of the carmakers and the value proposition of NASCAR.

The future of carmakers exists in plug-in hybrids – the combination of battery power and biofuels. According to Wired; it all starts in 2010. General Motors (GM) promises to have the Chevrolet Volt rolling into showrooms by then. Toyota says it will roll out a small fleet of plug-in Prius hybrids to see how they do. Volkswagen has similar plans for its plug-in Golf. And Fisker Automotive hopes to have a few dozen pricey Karma sedans in driveways within 18 months. Ford and others are moving more slowly, aiming for 2012 and beyond.

It may surprise some to learn that widespread adoption of plug-in hybrids isn’t in the distant future and may be in consideration for your next car. According to Mike Omotoso of J.D. Power & Associates “…we could see critical mass by 2015.”

NASCAR has a real opportunity for leadership – and can provide automotive manufacturers a real marketing platform that demonstrates alternative energy as performance cars – that are viable, affordable and energy efficient – and return NASCAR to its roots as “stock car” racing at its best.

As many of you know, I owned Bang Racing and led Toyota Motorsports’ racing team to a victorious year achieving record results for a newcomer to the series and sport. We won our first race in our 13th attempt – and consequently fueled our continuous mainstream media exposure. I was the first NASCAR Team Owner ever to appear live of the Fox News Channel and received international attention which created a cycle of vital media interest to fuel sponsorship demand and ROI for all of the Truck Series teams.
However, the Truck Series is a different animal today. Over the course of the last few years a lack of interest and dwindling financial support from the Big 3 – has morphed the series into nothing more than Toyota versus the independents. This one-sided competition is apparent in the absence from corporate sponsors and the lack of interest from the mainstream media.

Last year, Craftsman announced their leaving the series as the title sponsor. This is clear indication of the limitations the Truck Series has as a marketing platform. In contrast, back in 2003, as the owner of Bang Racing, I had both Craftsman and Snap-On Tools competing against each other to become the Official Tools of Bang Racing and a Major Associate sponsor of my team. And now -both have vastly reduced their involvement in the Truck Series altogether.

I speak from personal experience. Looking back to 2004, the marketing appeal of the Truck Series for corporate sponsors was rather limited. Today without the financial assistance of the Big 3 and practically little hope for its return; combined and with the rising costs of fuel and decreased consumers’ demand for light trucks and SUVs – NASCAR can’t hang the hopes of the Series on the unlikely event of another Japanese automotive manufacturer saving the Truck Series from its untimely demise. NASCAR must make significant changes to the scheduling, promotion and positioning of the Truck Series if they intend to secure the long-term viability of the Series.

Even though financial uncertainty for the Big 3 car companies is really nothing new – surging fuel prices have disproportionally affected the U.S. carmakers vs. their foreign counterparts. This is because of their reliance on profits from the sale of light-trucks and SUVs. In May, GM saw a 37% decline in light truck and SUV sales; and subsequently its share of the overall U.S. market dropped below 20%, a new low for the automotive giant that in 1980 had 45% of the U.S. market.

Over the past couple of years, as the trends of high fuel prices and the decrease in light truck and SUV sales became a reality – NASCAR adopted rules and policies to further alienate the automotive manufacturers from the sport. Instead of embracing alternative energy branding or a “green” platform – the recent implementation Car of Tomorrow (COT) – is nothing more than an antiquated “led sled” and continues a branding platform that labels the U.S. carmakers as gas guzzlers.

Some may ask, but isn’t racing and “green” technology or fuel efficiency an immediate dichotomy? The simple answer is NO – at least it doesn’t need to be.
I am the last person to believe that Ethanol fuel is the answer to our energy crisis or believe it will be the long-term solution for consumers and carmakers alike. However; one must recognize the success of Honda and their racing program in the Indy Racing League (IRL) – the IndyCar Series.

Back in 2006, the Indy Racing League (IRL) and IndyCar Series adopted the use of Ethanol fuel instead of traditional gasoline to provide Honda (their sole engine provider and automotive manufacturer) a marketing platform to appeal to the growing consumer demographic interested in alternative energy sources and “green” technology. When you compare recent sales results of Honda versus GM, Ford, Chrysler and Toyota – you must see the correlation between their brand positioning and the motorsports platform of the IndyCar Series. As of May 2008, Honda is now selling more cars than Chrysler.

Last week, GM racing director Mark Kent said that every level of motorsports that GM supports-from the giant stock-car racing series NASCAR to the grassroots Sports Car Club of America-is being evaluated. “Racing is not exempt (from cuts),” Kent said last week. Troy Clarke, president of GM North America, added: Motorsports “have not gone without scrutiny. I’m not going to get into specifics about NASCAR. But there will be modifications-changes in our marketing footprint-in this area.”

You must wonder – why is NASCAR asleep at the wheel? Over the past decade, NASCAR has developed a phenomenal market platform for all types of companies – but without the financial and marketing support of the carmakers – NASCAR teams can’t afford to operate.

The time is now for NASCAR to embrace tomorrow’s future – alternative energy and fuel efficiency branding is required for the long-term viability of the sport as a marketing platform for the automotive manufacturers.

In 2007 Dario Franchitti was one of the most accomplished drivers in American motorsports. When he moved from IndyCar (IRL) to NASCAR in 2008 he was full of hopes and dreams for an exciting future – and yet now he finds himself without a “ride” in 2008. What is happening in NASCAR? For Dario Franchitti, he isn’t sure what his future holds, but the former open-wheel star said Wednesday he’d like to remain in NASCAR.

It is not surprising, when viewing NASCAR and the economic climate today, that Dario Franchitti lost his ride when team owner Chip Ganassi closed down the unsponsored No. 40 Dodge – with 17 races into Dario’s first season in NASCAR.
But there is more in the making of this decision and the announcement really doesn’t surprise me – you have a team whose performance has been downright awful, a rookie driver struggling to adapt to a new form of racing, mass inflation in an already expensive business and serious downward pressure on the U.S. economy – specifically corporate advertising budgets. This is a wicked mixture for more future shakeups in the financially changed business model of team ownership in NASCAR.

The only question in my mind is when will there be a similar announcement from the Yates Racing organization. I can’t image that the Ford Motor Company will continue to fund the operations of a sponsor-less team; regardless of the fact that their performance has been promising.

More dark days are ahead for the NASCAR economy; rising gas prices and overall inflation are just the beginning – soon to come are significant effects of poor race attendance and souvenir sales. Since NASCAR Corp. is mostly focused on protecting the bottom line of their sister company – International Speedway Corp (ISC) – I would image there will be no relief in sight for the fledging racing teams – which are truly the heart and soul of NASCAR.

It’s ironic – the same rules that help you one season can come back to bite you the next. Case in point, the guaranteed starting position, which is afforded to the teams in the Top 35 in points, has been one of the motivating factors for the switch by Caterpillar to RCR (RCR #31 team is 2nd in the point’s standings). If you recall – this unfortunate rule was instituted by NASCAR only after the BDR Caterpillar team failed to qualify for a race in 2004 under the old rules. Regardless, you must congratulate RCR on their off-track success as they strengthen their organization to be better positioned to effectively compete with the super teams of Hendrick Motorsports and Joe Gibbs Racing.

Since 2002, the last year BDR won a race, they have rapidly unraveled and are clearly on the road of becoming defunct. In 2008 we see RCR redefining success with having 3 teams in the top 12; while two other organizations are teetering on the verge of extinction.

(full disclosure: In 2005, my team (Bang! Racing) was adding a Sprint Cup team and the Top 35 rule resulted in the loss of new sponsors)

“I used to say no way, no way. But it’s almost as expensive to run in the Nationwide Series. And they’re going to bring a COT in and we won’t be able to race in the Nationwide Series with the COT probably. That’ll just be too expensive to switch all that over.”

“…And the COT program is going to be too expensive for me to justify creating a whole new program with COT stuff, so I’d just as soon go into the Cup Series or get out of the Nationwide Series altogether.”

Dale Jr.’s statements raise an alarming concern on the viability of the Nationwide Series. Let’s be honest – if the Nationwide Series business model doesn’t work for JR/Hendrick Motorsports – why then, would anyone think it would work for someone else? I have a hard time envisioning any other team being able to justify the capital expenditure required to compete in the NASCAR Nationwide Series with the COT. The pending arrival of the COT to the Nationwide Series couldn’t be at a worst economic time. Even teams such as Richard Childress Racing (RCR) are struggling to find new sponsors; and in retrospect, recently announced that the former Championship #21 team would be reducing its schedule in 2008 for the Nationwide Series due to a lack of sponsorship.

It’s undisputed that the COT provides enhanced safety for the drivers – which are undeniably priceless. However, compensation for improved safety should be at the forefront of NASCAR’s economic model and NASCAR should provide assistance for the teams’ through financial allowances to ensure that drivers and crew members are safe; while at the same time, enabling team owners’ to survive. It’s unfortunate that team owners must bear 100% of the financial burden of safety while NASCAR corporate continues to retain the vast majority of revenues and profits – continuing to drain many of the teams’ livelihoods – and perhaps even to the sport’s future longevity.

If I was still an owner of my NASCAR team (Bang! Racing), I would organize the Nationwide Series Team Owners to take a stand and demand financial assistance from NASCAR to adopt the COT in 2009. If Dale Jr. can’t afford to- who in the world can?

By JEFF WOLF 

The past year of racing for Travis Kvapil has been so unique it makes the spelling of his last name seem like Smith or Jones.

It started at the end of the past NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series season when he had to sit in his truck after the finale in Homestead, Fla., until race officials determined whether he or Ted Musgrave had won the season championship.

Although the ruling favored Kvapil, his reign started under clouds of uncertainty as owners of his truck team had decided to cut him from its 2004 lineup.

So the 28-year-old from Wisconsin hooked his championship wagon to a team owned by Alex Meshkin, a 24-year-old Internet entrepreneur who never had owned a race team before starting Bang Racing late last year.

Adding to Kvapil’s gamble: Meshkin’s team would rely on the new Toyota Tundra in the truck series. The Japan-based manufacturer had a proven history in other forms of racing, but this would be its first in one of NASCAR’s three major series.

It was a pair of long shots for Kvapil, but both gambles have paid off.

He will start Saturday night’s Las Vegas 350 truck series race as one of three drivers through 18 races who have won more than once this year. He has six top-five finishes.

With one year left on his contract with Meshkin, Kvapil has no regrets that he joined the youngest team owner in a major NASCAR racing series.

“I really believed in the program he was building, and I knew that Toyota would put good motors and trucks on the race track,” Kvapil said.

Kvapil and teammate Mike Skinner, the series’ first champion in 1995, are among four teams using Toyota equipment, but Kvapil is the only one who has won.

His second win was Saturday in Loudon, N.H.

“To get the second one makes a statement that this team is for real,” Kvapil said. “We’re contenders.”

Kvapil’s team is sixth in the standings with six races left and 188 points behind leader Bobby Hamilton. While Kvapil remains a contender for the season title, he also is looking toward next season when he and Meshkin move up to the NASCAR Busch Series.

“That’s the plan,” Kvapil said. “I wouldn’t say it’s 100 percent solid, but our sponsors are behind us to move up to Busch. (Meshkin is) working on some other sponsors, so we really have the money we need.”

Kvapil also denied rumors published last weekend that he was in line to replace Las Vegan Brendan Gaughan in the No. 77 Dodge for Penske/Jasper Racing in the Nextel Cup Series.

“It’s that time of year for rumors,” Kvapil said. “No one from Penske has talked to me.”

Meshkin, a native of Washington, D.C., said he expects to make an official announcement about his NASCAR plans in 45 to 60 days and it could include a second part-time team in the Busch series. He also said Kvapil will compete in some truck races next year to support one of the team’s sponsors that makes products geared to pick-up trucks.

“When we go Busch racing, it’s more competitive and you’re racing Cup teams,” Meshkin said. “It’s an opportunity to beat (teams like ) Hendrick, to beat RCR (Richard Childress Racing). That will give us the momentum when we go Cup racing.

“We won’t go racing in any series unless we’re going to be competitive.”

Meshkin’s first year in NASCAR has included a learning curve. A disagreement with Toyota over unspecified issues led the manufacturer to announce three weeks ago that it was pulling support from the team that would have forced Meshkin to find Fords, Dodges or Chevrolets for his drivers to finish the truck season.

A week later, however, Toyota backed off the threat, but Skinner left Meshkin’s team and began driving for Bill Davis Racing, another Toyota-backed program.

“When there’s stuff like that there’s always going to be distractions, but it was neat the guys in the shop never missed a beat,” Kvapil said.

Meshkin brings a new approach to NASCAR’s tradition-based world.

“I think we’re the most successful new team in NASCAR history,” he said.

“You can accomplish anything; it’s how you go about it. I think we’re more relaxed than other teams. By having a culture that has created unity, we are a more competitive team.”

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Sep-21-Tue-2004/sports/24812898.html